Showing posts with label secret. Show all posts
Showing posts with label secret. Show all posts

Sunday, December 12, 2010

The secret Rule of Losing Weight easily

?Everyone knows how to lose weight and stay thin. All you have to do is burn more calories than you consume, right? Well, it’s not quite that simple, but there is a very scientific way of handling this challenge that virtually guarantees results for everyone who follows the same formula. The basis of permanent weight loss has never really changed: consume fewer calories and, at the same time, try to burn additional calories by moving your body to a greater degree than you were accustomed to moving it in the past.Unfortunately, the ability of humans to master this approach
hasn’t changed a whole lot, despite years of trying.

The result? Millions of Americans are locked in an endless struggle to control their weight and master their health. The trouble is that lurking behind the simplicity of the cardinal rule of
weight loss is a problem of far greater difficulty. You may have heard it verbalized like this: “I just can’t seem to lose weight predictably.” “I think I’ve screwed up my metabolism.”

“Professional” dieters, defined here as people who have dieted so many times they can’t count them all, resoundingly report that repeated dieting causes major roadblocks to their efforts to lose weight and stay thin. Study after study has shown that the “yo-yo” dieting effect that we in America seem to be caught up in is very taxing to the correct functioning of our Prelude to the System metabolism. Hence, our metabolic rate becomes slower and slower with each weight-loss–weight-gain cycle. But that’s not the only reason why our metabolisms may be a bit sluggish. The strength, or the “speed,” of our metabolism is usually determined by several factors, such as

·? Past dieting, especially attempts at rapid weight loss

·? Age As a matter of fact, your metabolism begins to slow in early adulthood, at a rate of 2 percent per decade.

·? Activity level Less active people generally have a slower metabolism.

·? Lack of proper physical activity Certain exercises tend to increase a person’s metabolism while others have only a slight effect on it. By making small but appropriate changes to your current level of activity, you could boost your metabolism
massively (more on this in the chapter on exercise).

·? Lack of proper meal placement during the day—every day
One notion about weight loss that’s prevalent in this country is that people can lose weight by skipping breakfast. Nothing could be further from the truth! In fact, eating a healthful breakfast actually turns up our fatburning furnace (our metabolism) and gives us far more mental and physical energy for the first half of the day.

?A full description of how and when to eat for best results will be laid out for you later in this article. Now let’s get back to your past dieting attempts. Just look at the results and note the undesirable changes that seem to occur the more times you’ve dieted. By better than a two-to-one margin over less-frequent dieters, “professional” dieters have found that:

·? Weight-loss strategies that used to be effective for them are showing far fewer results now
·? Gaining weight has become easier
·? Losing weight has become harder
·? Dieting plateaus have become more frequent
·? Weight loss is becoming increasingly hopeless The cause of all of these common complaints is the slowing of your metabolism.

?Well, now is the time to put an end to that. Now is the time to take control of your metabolism—and your life.Very few people are aware of their own “weak link,” the reason that their particular metabolism is not working at peak efficiency. Everyone who has attempted to lose weight through dieting has created one or more personal “weak links,” and these weak links are the reason why other weight-loss programs fail to get you the results you want.

Remember, you’re seeking a new level of understanding of how your metabolism works, and at the same time you’re training your metabolism to function at its optimum level.
Many overweight men and women find that trying to control their metabolic rate is nothing short of a hellish nightmare, and that’s why the word “permanent” has never been part of their weight-loss vocabulary. One recent national survey showed, for example, that 66 percent of Americans were overweight. Translated into absolute numbers, this means that at least 90
million adults take in more calories than they burn up. Another review, this one called the National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey, showed that the number of overweight Americans increased by 8 percent between 1976 and 1988, and I’m willing to bet that the number has continued to increase in the years since 1988. The said thing is that not only are the overweight becoming more numerous, they’re also getting fatter, despite the fact that there are more “weight-loss” products, creams, pills, and potions on the market today than ever before.

According to the National Center for Health Statistics, American men now weigh nearly 9 pounds more, on average, than in 1960, and American women weigh nearly 13 pounds more, on average, than their counterparts of just a decade ago. How could this be possible? After all, in the past, people didn’t know half of what they know today about proper diet and exercise! Just as one example, back in the 1960s there was a state-of-the-art exercise machine that I like to call the Fat Vibrator. You know what I’m talking about: the machine that had a large belt that a “fitness expert” would wrap around your waist. When the machine was turned on, the belt would “vibrate” the weight right off of your body.

?Well, this sounds funny to us now, but back then people really believed that it would help them lose weight—and there are versions of that machine still on the market today! Yes, people are getting fatter, and, as a nation, we seem powerless to reverse this trend, despite our best attempts to do so. But the worst is almost surely yet to come: Though only about one in four Americans are obese, fully 80 percent of men and 70 percent of women over the age of forty are more than 10 pounds overweight. If you’re in your twenties or thirties now and are having difficulty losing weight, you can well imagine how hard it will be for you to slim down in another ten or twenty years.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Scott Mendelson: DVD Review: Secret Origin: the Story of DC Comics (2010)

Secret Origin: The Story of DC Comics
2010
90 minutes
Not Rated

Available on DVD from Warner Home Video on November 9th

by Scott Mendelson

Secret Origin is, at best, a cliff-notes version of the 75-year history of DC Comics. Running just 90 minutes, the film barely scratches the surface of the illustrious publishing house that literary changed the country. Narrated by Ryan Reynolds, the film is a primer of sorts for the casual superhero fan, perhaps younger audiences who have just discovered the four-color legends. But considering that anyone who would purchase this $20 barebones disc (there's not even a scene index) is likely already a knowledgeable fan of the DC universe, it is disappointing that this entertaining piece of history doesn't dig a little deeper, or linger a little longer in the less-reported annals of comic book history. It is swiftly paced and never boring, but it feels truncated. It is less a genuine documentary than a piece of marketing that probably should have been included as a supplemental feature on a future DC Comics film or cartoon.

The film surely covers the basics. It goes into how Siegel and Shuster's experiences as poor Jewish immigrants shaped their creation of Superman, how Superman's popularity spawned an entirely new genre: the costumed superhero comic book, how Superman went from a staunch FDR-ish crusader for social justice in the 1940s to a domesticated representative of 1950s conformity. In fact, Superman dominates much of the feature, which makes sense until you remember that the Man of Steel had an entire 110 minute documentary all about him in 2006 (the vastly superior Look, Up in the Sky!: The Amazing Story of Superman). It details the various travails of Wonder Woman, who started out as the creation of a bondage-obsessed feminist scholar and basically became an ongoing symbol of what kind of femininity America was comfortable with at any given time. Humorous apologies are extended for the powered-down, costume-less 1970s variation.

The piece is actually pretty light on Batman, which is both refreshing and frustrating. It is nice to have a DC project that isn't dominated by the Dark Knight, but omitting the 1970s Dennis O'Neil/Neal Adams Dark Knight Detective revival shapes the narrative so that once again Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns gets sole credit for revitalizing the character after forty-years of post World War II camp. Contrary to Miller's famous quote, Batman got his balls back seventeen years before Frank Miller wrote his otherwise groundbreaking 'Elseworld'. On the plus side, Bill Finger is specifically referenced as a co-creator of Batman alongside Bob Kane (anyone else ever notice how much a young Bob Kane resembles The Joker?). The documentary also deserves credit for acknowledging that the 1960s TV show literary saved the Batman comic book from cancellation, something I've discussed before. But it loses points for barely even mentioning Batman: The Animated Series and the eighteen years (and counting) worth of storytelling that it gave way to.

As far as discussing any characters outside the 'holy trinity', pretty much everyone else is given the short shrift. The 1970s counter-culture liberal vs. conservative Green Arrow/Green Lantern arc is given a solid highlight. Ironically, mention is made of Speedy becoming hooked on drugs, which they claim destroyed the Comics Code, while no mention is made of Harry Osborn's concurrent drug addiction over in Spider-Man, issues which went out without a Comics Code seal at all. Julie Schwartz comes off as a major hero, as he is justifiably credited with single-handedly reviving the B-list characters from the 1940s (Green Lantern, The Flash, etc). And late mentions are made of the work of Alan Moore (Watchmen, Swamp Thing, etc) and Neil Gaiman's Sandman. Oddly enough, despite being released in 2010, the documentary comes to a dead stop just after the 9/11 attacks in late 2001. No mention is made of anything that happened in on the printed page over the last nine years.

As this is an 'authorized' story of DC Comics, there are no mentions whatsoever of the darker times in the companies history. The disgraceful treatment of Superman creators Siegel and Shuster goes unmentioned, as does Alan Moore's falling out with DC and/or the entire industry nearly collapsing in the mid-1990s due to the temporary speculative boom. Heck, even inconvenient facts about the stories themselves are left out. A token reference is made to superheroes becoming darker in the late 80s and early 90s, but no specific examples are given, not even Green Lantern (specifically Hal Jordan, whom narrator Ryan Reynolds will be portraying next summer), who went crazy and slaughtered most of the Green Lantern Corp in 1994. There is a quick pan to the Death and the Family #3 cover, without any reference to the hysteria-inducing call-in contest that had comic readers deciding whether or not Jason Todd (the second Robin) should perish in an explosion. Even for an authorized glance behind the scenes, this is a shockingly sanitized look at DC Comics.
Despite the token entertainment value and the nostalgia that's sure to come from seeing all of your favorite heroes being given a token mention, Secret Origins: the Story of DC Comics is shockingly uninformative. While there is some pleasure is the archival footage and interviews that pepper the first third of the documentary (Bill Finger is indeed credited as a Batman co-creator, but Jerry Robinson's name never comes up), this is more of a feature-length commercial than a stand-alone document. Heck, the entire 90 minute feature has far less trivia and insight than even the DC Comics Wikipedia page.

Grade: C

?

Follow Scott Mendelson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ScottMendelson

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Proof of the secret NASA UFO # 1 technology (part 1)

Oct. 26 2010


Documentary Thisincredible we will hear the great Mr. David Sereda is a very credible physics expert. He will explain the theory of quantum physics and how NASA has harnessed the saucer technology technology flying years. Mr. Sereda explain how UFOs work, how they move in space and on Earth, the impressive power proof of the existence of UFO with photographs and video footage of space NASA files and extreme durability of the flying saucer skin they contain in their engines. An incredible documentary and it is some must see for anyone out there who is studying quantum physics, the propulsion or stories of UFO just agree on a daily basis. Please visit and Mr. David Sereda support at to provide the world with this incredible information.Mr. Sereda has done many wonderful things to the public in writing books and creating many DVD explaining all the documents covered by this documentaire.LIVRES - www.lulu.com DVD (s) - www.azom.com and search "David Sereda"

Tags

Auctions Beauty best Biotherm Body Care Chanel cosmetics Dior Dress episode family Mode Finance de Charm Hair Transport Health Home L'Oreal Last Search Search Loss Luxury Make-up Marriage Natural Paris Part Perfume Plastic products Review Show Skin SPF50 Advice tutorial VIDEO Marriage Weight Women [标签: 关键词]

Leave a reply

This entry transmitted via the service for full-text RSS - if this is your content and you read on someone to another site, please read our FAQ page fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Article five filters features: After Hiroshima - non-rapport Cancer Catastrophe of Fallujah.


View the original article here