Friday, December 24, 2010

Michael Russnow: Black Swan: A Must See Even if Ballet Ain't Your Thing

I don't go to the ballet and have only seen one a long time ago. Interestingly, it was Swan Lake performed, as in the film Black Swan, at Lincoln Center in New York City.

2010-12-24-BlackSwanmovieposter2.jpg

It is an art form that doesn't interest me and I say this at the outset, because, as in the case of The Fighter, about which I recently wrote, though I'm not drawn to the arena I was captivated by the motion picture itself.

Like The Turning Point and Billy Elliot, two major films that dealt with similar subject matter, Black Swan is elevated by a story of conflict, hopes, unfulfilled dreams and the fear of failure, and in those areas the movie soars.

Plus, it's a mystery and a bit of a thriller, as we're not really sure what's going on at the beginning when we meet the young ballerina Nina Sayers, played so movingly by Natalie Portman. We see red marks on her body and it appears that perhaps her career will be cut short by a serious illness. Maybe it's leukemia or Hodgkins, we don't know. But we are saddened by the prospect, and that's all I'm going to tell those of you who haven't yet seen the film.

We are introduced to her mother, Erica, portrayed by the always surprising and still beautiful Barbara Hershey, and though we might be expecting a ballet version of Mama Rose, it's not quite so. There are similarities in the sense that there is a competitive drive she instills in her daughter, but it's not pathetic and there's no cruelty. She has missed her own chances and, yes, there may well be a vicarious thrill she experiences in her daughter's success, but she is loving and genuinely cares.

We also see the political world of ballet, the cutthroat competition exhibited by newly arrived dancer Lily, played by a fairly transparent but intriguing Mila Kunis. Lily is alternately likable and devious, and to the audience it's clear she wants to be the star, and the only way to get the principal role is to get rid of the timid and haunted Nina, whom she aggressively befriends.

All this, as Nina fights to become the White/Black Swan and to seduce the choreographer with her persona. However, Thomas Leroy, played in a tough, yet loving manner by French actor Vincent Cassel, would prefer a true sexual dalliance, as he'd had with the soon to retire, now over the hill ballet star, Beth MacIntyre, whose performance is conceived so well by an embittered Winona Ryder.

The writing by Mark Heyman, Andres Heinz, John J. McLaughlin, with the story by Heinz is taut and unpredictable, and the melodrama is kept to a minimum as any good suspense mystery should be. And it's wrapped together in a wonderful package by director Darren Aronofsky to such an extent that you are gripped from almost the beginning right until the captivating end.

Ballet may not be your thing and it may keep the box office grosses from setting any records. But if you like to watch beautiful images and at the same time engross yourself in a masterful world, at times unexpectedly keeping you at the edge of your seat, I recommend Black Swan as one of the best films of 2010, sure to be an Oscar contender in major categories.

Michael Russnow's website is ramproductionsinternational.com

?

Follow Michael Russnow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kerrloy

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Beth Arnold: Letter From Paris: A Very Joyeux Christmas

Christmas Eve is finally here, and what have I brought to you from Paris?

I come bearing the star of our brilliant tree Bébé-Marie, the Christmas Monkey.

Photo by Beth Arnold


Every year Bébé-Marie crawls out of your liquor cabinet and swings through your trees to shake things up. She likes toe-tapping jazz and Cajun music not to mention a good party, and, oh, how she loves to dance! Bébé-Marie crowns our tree resplendently, overseeing her subjects that include Mexican tin Day of the Dead decorations, sparkly balls, golden bows, and our newest acqusitions, brightly colored (and wiggly) fishing lures. They take on a special glow beneath her skirt.

Photo by Beth Arnold


If you're lucky, Bébé-Marie might just swing into your house to liven up your Christmas! To entice her, leave mincemeat cookies and a glass of old rum next to some rocking CDs.

Wishing everyone a Happy Holiday Season filled with peace, love, and joy. Blessings to all. Have a very Joyeux Christmas!


Beth Arnold lives and writes in Paris. To see more of her work, go to www.betharnold.com.

?

Follow Beth Arnold on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BethArnold

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

The Best Dinner Roll Recipes From Food52.com


For the past year, Food52.com readers have been voting in weekly showdowns of reader-submitted recipes on a given theme. The winning recipes of each week will end up in Food52's upcoming cookbook, along with bios of the people who submitted them (Food52 explains the process in simple detail here).

Food52 and its co-founders Amanda Hesser and Merrill Stubbs have invited HuffPost Food readers to vote on week 16's contest (of the second year, and the second book).

This week's showdown is for the best holiday breakfast recipes.

Check the finalists out below, and vote for your favorite here.

* * *

Heavenly Oatmeal-Molasses Rolls


Photo: Sarah Shatz

Amanda and Merrill's notes on Heavenly Oatmeal-Molasses Rolls on Food52.com:

Monkeymom's supple, rich rolls have just a hint of sweetness to them -- they're chewy and tender and full of deep flavor from the molasses, but versatile enough to complement (rather than overwhelm) a variety of main dishes. We love the ease of the first refrigerator rise, and these are virtually guaranteed to come out looking beautiful, with their butter-slicked and oat-flecked tops. - A&M

View the Heavenly Oatmeal-Molasses Rolls recipe here.

Vote for this recipe here.

* * *

Sour Cream Dinner Rolls


Photo: Sarah Shatz

Amanda and Merrill's notes on Sour Cream Dinner Rolls on Food52.com:

Accomplished bread baker AntoniaJames showcases her best practices with this recipe. We love the attention to detail in her instructions, as well as the option of a quick or slow rise. These rolls are complex and layered in flavor because they use a combination of several different starches, and they're enriched by the dairy fat from the sour cream and butter. We found that our dough needed some time outside the fridge to finish its first rise. - A&M

View the Sour Cream Dinner Rolls recipe here.

Vote for this recipe here.

Get HuffPost Food On Twitter!

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Joe Berrios Gets Memo Warning Against Hiring Relatives

Weeks after Cook County Assessor Joseph Berrios drew criticism for putting his son and sister on the payroll, a report was sent out by two county watchdogs reminding of ethics rules against hiring kin...

Weeks after Cook County Assessor Joseph Berrios drew criticism for putting his son and sister on the payroll, a report was sent out by two county watchdogs reminding of ethics rules against hiring kin...

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Mailman, Andrew W.K. Sing 'Silent Night' In Impromptu Duet (VIDEO)

Andrew W.K.'s hot new internet video features an unexpected guest: Rodney the Mailman.

The singer-songwriter was in the Chicago offices of The Onion A.V. Club, recording a number of versions of "Silent Night" for their terrific "Holiday Undercover" series. At the end of the recording, the office mailman Rodney is coming through. He's sung on a couple of tracks in the Onion studio before, so the staff asks W.K. if he'd mind doing a duet with Rodney.

The result is nothing short of pure Christmas magic.

Watch the impromptu performance:


Andrew W.K. and Rodney The Mailman cover "Silent Night"

For more from the Holiday Undercover recordings, head to AVClub.com.

Get HuffPost Chicago On Twitter and Facebook!

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Poppy King: Beauty and The Brain: The 7 Worst Beauty Trends Of The Decade (PHOTOS)

It wasn't called the "noughties" for nothing. Looking back on this last decade through a beauty prism it was an odd decade indeed! If I were to take a stab at the major influence on beauty it wasn't the big screen but the little one, both TV and online.

Beauty returned to small screens with some very mixed results. When it was good it was very, very good and when it was bad it was horrid. In this most recent era beauty was not outside the box ...it was on it.

Without a doubt, so-called Reality TV was the single biggest offender in some very strange and disturbing beauty trends.

Here is what was unleashed:

Beyond Heinous!

Yuckiest.

?

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Snooth: 10 Holiday Gift Wines Under $15


With the holidays in full swing I know we're all looking for gifting guidance. Sometimes the hardest gifts to buy are those for the people you know the least: your doorman, hairdresser, letter carrier, or assistant. While cash is always appreciated, adding a nice bottle of wine personalizes the gift in a way cash never could.

Understanding that we all have different price levels at which we are comfortable, and noting that these gifts do add up, I've pulled together 10 wines under $15 that are delicious and would be fine gifts to give someone this holiday season.

While some may think that $15 is a lot to spend on a bottle of gifting wine, others might think $5 is way too low. The truth is that all of these wines are great values, representing the best of their varieties, regions, and price points, and thus are worthy of consideration as a gift, or for keeping

Share your affordable gift wines in the comments...

Related Articles:


  • Great Gifts for Wine Lovers

  • Snooth Vintage of the Year

?

Follow Snooth on Twitter: www.twitter.com/snooth

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

The Wahlbergs' Macaroni Salad

Food & Wine:

Thanks to his brother, chef Paul Wahlberg, we've got the recipe for the Wahlberg family macaroni salad. Mark says that no one makes the dish as well as their mother, Alma. But you can give it your best shot (here's the recipe, below).

Read the whole story Get HuffPost Food On Twitter!

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Tory Burch: A Chefs & Foodies Guide to the Holidays (PHOTOS)


The holidays are the perfect time to pull out old family recipes, test-drive new ones and indulge a little (or a lot). On our blog, we asked a few top chefs what their favorite home-cooked meal is, best place to grab a drink with friends and go-to holiday dessert. See what Eric Ripert, Mario Batali, Morimoto and more had to say.

I'll pass.

Cheers to that!

?

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Monday, December 20, 2010

Michael Russnow: Survivor Nicaragua: Yes, Fabio, There Is a Santa Claus!

With Christmas coming, isn't it great when a miracle occurs? Judson Birza (aka Fabio on the latest edition of CBS' Survivor Nicaragua) managed to stay under the radar as a good-looking, generally perceived vacuous competitor, who no one really considered a threat until it was too late. And he won!

2010-12-20-Survivorcast2.jpg


As I said commenting in another article during the Survivor Nicaragua run, it would be foolish to take this 21-year-old guy for granted. True, there were a lot of goofy things he said around the campfire, but in private confessionals he often revealed lots of common sense. His awareness about how he was viewed by the others and strategy revelations convinced me from the beginning he was the one to watch.

Why? Well, he was very strong in the reward and immunity challenges, helping his teammates escape Jeff Probst's quenching of their torch too early. He was also one of the first winners of individual immunity when the teams were merged.

But it all slid by the notice of the others who considered themselves superior, in particular the sly and crafty Brenda who, with Sash, fancied themselves the puppet masters of the tournament, as did Russell a couple of seasons back.

And indeed they were able to sideswipe a number of their targets, who they believed to be stronger threats, leaving Jud, now known as Fabio, because of his long golden locks, to take a back seat and amiably go along with how they told him to vote. Their success was fleeting though, because, unbeknownst to Brenda, she was betrayed by her "friends" Sash and Chase, and was sent out of the game as the third member to sit in the jury box.

At a certain point as the numbers dwindled down to seven it became clear maybe it was time to get rid of Jud/Fabio, and I feared it would happen. Perhaps it was because he'd shown some brainpower when he missed putting together a complicated puzzle, losing to Sash by only a matter of seconds.

2010-12-20-JudBirza2.jpg

So, they convinced Jud/Fabio that Holly would go, while the conspirators, including Benry, told the audience it would be Jud/Fabio. But Benry had likewise been a force and had come in second to Chase in the reward challenge, so it was a shocked Benry whose torch was snuffed out.

Okay, Jud/Fabio got a pass, but it was clear he would go the next time -- unless he won the immunity challenge, which Jane, Sash, Holly and Chase were determined to block. However, a funny thing happened to their plans as Jud/Fabio pumped up his mental acuity, matching pieces he was only allowed to feel as the competitors were blindfolded. And even though he failed the first time he thought he'd finished, he worked so fast he had a second chance to recoup before the others could beat him.

Sash and Chase, who thought they could lead the "dumb" Jud/Fabio around like a mule, told him the next choice to go would be Dan, but found Jud/Fabio had different ideas. He wanted Jane out, sensing her hard luck personal story might win the jury votes and, though Jane was allied with the "noble" Sash, Chase and Holly, they dutifully voted her out.

But they'd get Jud/Fabio the next time for sure, and this time it looked like it would happen, because the kid, who in their minds was clearly deprived in the smarts department, had in fact failed to answer a critical question in the challenge, and Sash, Holly and Chase were well into putting together a jigsaw puzzle before Jud/Fabio could begin the process. But wouldn't you know, son of a gun, this rube from St. Louis, getting by on his handsome pug, just zipped along, eyes purposefully on the stack in front of him and won immunity again. The others couldn't believe it.

Jud/Fabio tried to save Dan and it looked as if they all agreed to get rid of Holly, but at the tribal council it was Dan who joined the jury, even with Jud/Fabio's vote. Well, in fairness, Dan had previously voted for Jud/Fabio to leave in an earlier episode.

One more immunity challenge and the three would certainly vote Jud/Fabio out. I was hoping for an endurance challenge, but it was a balancing act, wherein coins of different sizes were added to a pile until it fell. First, Holly's heap crashed, then Chase's, and it was between Sash and Jud/Fabio, whose slowly mounting coins seemed precarious on a number of occasions. My heart was beating fast. This would do it. And no way would Chase and Sash get rid of Holly. Jud/Fabio was dead.

But the Gods were with the good guy, as sometimes they are, and it was Sash's pile that fell, and the blond surfer/model was now in the finals.

It was amusing how everyone started sucking up to Jud/Fabio, in particular Sash who pretended to be his friend and lied that he would've gotten rid of Holly had he won immunity. Jud/Fabio, no fool he, saw right through it, but sensed Holly would get more jury votes and the three men voted her off that evening.

At this point, to my mind it was a no-brainer, not just because of my personal feelings, but clearly there'd be new found respect for Jud/Fabio, even by those who'd dismissed him like Brenda and NaOnka (forever to be known as one of the Survivor quitters). During the final tribal council when the three finalists were interrogated, it was Chase and Sash who got a lot of flack for telling lies, and Jud/Fabio appeared clean and likable. Though it did make me wince when Holly wondered whether Jud/Fabio's play was, with his three back-to-back immunity wins, too little too late?

Jud/Fabio was earnest and articulate with his replies. To her query and to the attacks by Sash and Chase that he'd been a pawn and not much of a competitor, he masterfully defended himself. He'd gotten to the final three, hadn't he? And with loads of pressure, knowing he'd be voted out if he didn't win immunity, he did so three times in a row. What more did they need, regarding what makes a champion?

The capper came when Alina, the first to become a jury member, said she wasn't sure she wanted to give a million dollars to a "boy." And Chase tried to pull out the heartstrings by indicating he'd tithe his winnings to cancer research in honor of his dead father. Not missing a beat, Jud/Fabio chimed in he would use his winnings to help his parents.

In the end, it proved quite suspenseful. We knew there were two votes for Jud/Fabio and Chase, the latter of whom got clueless Alina's vote and that of Brenda, even though Chase had double-crossed her. Jud/Fabio got Marty and Dan, but as of now there hasn't been news of how the other five voted.

When Jeff Probst read the results, it was Fabio, Chase, Fabio, Chase, then Chase, Chase, leading me to believe, oh, no that unethical Chase is going to win. However, the next three votes went to Jud/Fabio and the audience roared its approval as it did every time his name was announced, as opposed to a sense of dismay when Chase was mentioned. Sash, the self-proclaimed grand master didn't get a single vote.

All in all an exciting finale and a justified one, referencing Aesop's fable about the tortoise and the hare. What bothers me, though, is that the role of a jury is to examine the evidence, and at least four of them couldn't get past their initial view of Jud/Fabio and look at the realities, that he'd outlasted all but Chase and Sash and had performed remarkably under a huge amount of pressure in the final three immunity challenges. Let's hope that jurors on real criminal and civil cases don't function in that manner.

Hip, hip hooray for Judson Birza. A nice and interesting guy won. Isn't that swell?

Michael Russnow's website is ramproductionsinternational.com

?

Follow Michael Russnow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kerrloy

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Nick Evans: 7 One-Ingredient Appetizers


Over the holiday season, you can never have too many snacks for people to munch on.

It's inevitable that you'll have a few extra mouths to feed or maybe one mouth that's just a lot bigger than you expected.

For times like these, it's a good idea to have a few snacks in your back pocket that you can whip out and save the day.

Below are seven snacks that can be made with one main ingredient plus a few things that you probably have on hand.

?

Follow Nick Evans on Twitter: www.twitter.com/macheesmo

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Liquor.com: Holiday Gift Guide: Scotch

Forget the tinsel, mistletoe and dreidels; it wouldn't be the holidays without a glass of Scotch. The delicious whisky is, of course, Scotland's thoughtful gift to the world. But with an unprecedented selection of bottles on store shelves, how do you find a great present? To help you out, we asked Mike Ryan, head bartender at Chicago's Sable Kitchen & Bar (which offers more than 180 different single malts and blends), and Ethan Kelley, formerly of New York City's Brandy Library (which stocks more than 350 Scotches), for some of their favorites.

?

Follow Liquor.com on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Liquor

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Marie-Lou Fernandes: Leadership Without Legitimacy: Will The Indian Media Get Its Act Together?

After remaining wilfully silent on India's biggest corruption story of the year (Hear the Radia tapes here) the immediate reaction of some sections of the Indian media was to divert attention to Brand India and corporate privacy concerns. We are now witness to another diversion - the case for corporate lobbying (never mind that corporate lobbying has just robbed the country of hundreds of millions of dollars).

Let's take for example a single routine event like last week's conference on corporate sustainability addressed by Corporate Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid. Since the event was held in the wake of the Radia tapes leak the Minister was quizzed on legal regulation of the corporate sector by attending journalists. What follows is a quick and, unfortunately, dirty analysis of the reports that were published in the English media

Of the fourteen randomly surveyed reports not a single Indian publication mentioned the real context of the questions viz. the corruption issue unearthed by the Radia tapes. The only publication to report this context was non-Indian, the South Asia Mail. While the others remained silent, six of the Indian publications chose to cite a misleading context instead, viz. privacy concerns, not the issues of corruption that the tapes revealed. These publications include Times Now, Economic Times, Indian Express, Express Buzz, Deccan Chronicle and Business Standard.

Two of the corporate owned and managed publications chose to include references by Deepak Parekh and Lalit Bhasin, leveraging these apparently "authoritative sources" in favor of the underlying argument against privacy violations. No references were cited on the corruption issue. These publications were Indian Express and Economic Times.

Most of the publications captured the cautious statements of the Minister who balanced issues of privacy with those of corruption. This was represented in the headlines that spoke of 'regulations', 'curbs' and 'limits' to corporate lobbying. However two publications spun headlines that were in dissonance with all others and with their own news content. These were Indian Express and Times Now that headlined 'CorpMin gives thumbs up to lobbying, PR' and 'Khursheed for legalizing lobbying'. The only publication to underscore the obligations of corporate India was Hindu which headlined 'Stress on Ethical Business.'

With all due regard to Indian circumspection how does one justify a failure to report, to say nothing of actively misleading readers on the real context of questions posed to the Minister?! And with all due respect to Eastern mysticism and the eternal subjectivity of human experience how exactly does one explain such variance in the headlines?! Was the Minister speaking in two tongues such that twelve reporters understood a case for regulating corporate lobbying and two saw a strong justification for it instead? Should the reader blandly apprehend the report content devoid of context, be tantalizingly diverted by the headlines, or perhaps conclude that maybe, just maybe, the journalist, sub-editor and editor are beholden to the news corporation and not to journalistic ethics?

Despite the enormity of the corruption issue in the Radia tape leakage and the role played by the country's top journalists in facilitating it, the Indian media shows little accountability to the public and there are still no apologies forthcoming. On the other hand, at a recent forum by India's press corps, the President of the Editor's Guild continued to support those journalists who manufactured convenient stories and brokered deals for corporate interests.

There can be no greater disgrace than the fact that the entire dissemination of the biggest corruption story of the year was managed by citizens and nonresident Indians through the Internet. If Indian media wishes to remain relevant in the Internet age, they will have to fight for change - a working code of ethics, new leaders, better role models for the new generation of journalists, and if possible, a little humility now and then.

?

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Helen Davey: September 11 and the Effects of Trauma

I wrote this article exactly nine years ago in December 2001, for the American Airlines flight attendant union publication Skyword, in hopes of reaching out to those flight attendants who were suffering in silence and wouldn't ask for help with their traumatic reactions after the terrorist attacks of 9/11. American Airlines experienced the loss of two airplanes and flight crews on September 11, and tragically, in November, lost another airplane and crew in a crash that exacerbated employees' fears. This was my first published article on trauma and PTSD, and I'm posting this as a blog now in hopes that you as the reader will be able to substitute any form of trauma that you might have experienced; the information remains the same.

In this essay, I am speaking directly to the American Airlines flight attendant employees. It begins:

Many of you have been suffering since the terrorist attacks of September 11. Indeed, the crash of Flight 587 seems overwhelming to think about. Having been a Pan Am flight attendant for 20 years, and a psychotherapist for 15, I feel compelled to reach out through this article to help you understand the nature of trauma, for trauma is what these attacks have been for all of you. Perhaps if you just pretend that we're sitting on a jumpseat together, doing what flight attendants do best -- jumpseat therapy -- I can offer some ideas about what you might be feeling and why.

Most people are not aware that Pan Am employees endured continuing terrorist attacks since the 1970s, and that we had to live with constant threats as well as the loss of friends. Add to that the pressure of management problems, financial turmoil, airplane crashes, layoffs, Lockerbie and finally the fall of Pan Am, and it adds up to a traumatized work force. Aware of the turmoil that my beloved fellow employees endured, I decided to study trauma through the eyes and hearts of former Pan Am employees. I then wrote my doctoral dissertation on what I learned and titled it "A Psychoanalytic Exploration of the Fall of Pan Am." I hope that it might be of some benefit to you in these uncertain and scary times.

Trauma is any event outside the usual, expectable realm of human experience that causes a reaction of intense fear, helplessness or horror. The events of September 11 certainly fall within this definition. The experience of trauma can produce post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD. There are three hallmarks of PTSD. The first one is intrusive memories, which are recurring thoughts and dreams that elicit the same terror as the experience. Have you been having disturbing dreams or nightmares? Do frightening images come into your mind over and over? The second is hypervigilance, in which you stay on red alert, and any sudden noise may trigger panic or aggression. Are you worrying about "going off" on passengers, or even worse, your children and loved ones? Is your patience level markedly different since September 11? The third hallmark of PTSD is withdrawal, through which shying away from situations that stimulate painful memories isolates the sufferer. Have you been avoiding friends or family or conversations with them? Are you disappointed with their lack of empathy for you?

The symptoms of trauma can sneak up on you in subtle ways, until you finally feel overwhelmed and don't know what hit you. Symptoms vary widely from individual to individual and can include feelings of hopelessness, indifference and isolation. Insomnia is common, or the feeling of just wanting to stay in bed under the covers where it's safe. A loss of appetite or the inability to stop eating everything in sight can be experienced, as well as headaches, chest pains, feelings of intense fear when recollecting the overwhelming event, putting yourselves in the terrifying place of those who lost their lives, or imagining exactly what it was like for them. And, of course, wondering how you would have handled the same situation yourself. Persistent anxiety, jumpiness, fear, feeling out of control and excessive worry over loved ones' safety can be present.

Fundamental to the experience of trauma can be a devastating sense of helplessness. In my study of Pan Am employees, this feeling of powerlessness was a common theme. Sometimes this led to feelings of betrayal and painful disillusionment with Pan Am's management, who were seen as parental figures. However, such anger was not usually felt toward the Pan Am "family" as a whole. I can see many parallels between the feelings and behaviors of Pan Am employees and those of American Airlines employees now. Are you feeling angry about not having been protected? Some employees turn to unusual behaviors to counteract their helpless feelings. For example, they may become obsessed with gaining as much knowledge as possible about what is happening. Or they may keep their lives "orderly," cleaning out and straightening every nook and cranny in their homes. There are some flight attendants who have not even been able to unpack their bags since September 11. Others deal with the emotional trauma by a cutting off of emotion, and sometimes pushing those close to them away. Are you feeling numb or not very loving? A particularly traumatizing aspect of September 11 was the inability of so many flight attendants to get home. Many people state that they are less afraid of dying than of being helplessly stranded so far from home. They are more terrified of feeling those feelings again than they are of actually dying.

A common theme in the trauma literature, one that lies at the heart of psychological trauma and is related to a sense of helplessness, is of a sense of alienation and aloneness, and a profound despair about the improbability of ever having one's experience understood. A traumatized person can feel as if he or she is an alien to the "normal" people around them, a conviction that leads to a sense of alienation and aloneness, that an unbridgeable gulf separates him or her from the understanding of others. Anxiety slips into panic when it has to be borne in isolation. Hence, there needs to be a place where painful feelings can be shared. I know that many of you feel that family and loved ones have a hard time understanding what you're going through since September 11, and perhaps you might even feel estranged from your fellow flight attendants, especially if they are not expressing feelings of fear.

Dr. Robert Stolorow has written about the concept of trauma and the absolutism of everyday life. By "absolutism," he is referring to beliefs and assumptions whose validity are not open for discussion and that unconsciously play a role in the normality of everyday life. For example, you might say to a friend, "Have a safe trip," or, "I'll see you when you get home." These are statements whose validity isn't questioned. Such assumptions are the basis for a kind of na?ve optimism that allows one to function in the world believed to be stable and predictable. It is the essence of psychological trauma that it shatters these absolutisms, a catastrophic loss of innocence that alters one's sense of safety in the world. When one can no longer believe in the absolutism of everyday life, the universe becomes random and unpredictable. The traumatized person perceives the world differently from others, and an anguished sense of estrangement and solitude takes form.

As if this sense of estrangement and isolation were not enough to bear, another aspect of traumatization makes a difficult situation even more painful: it isn't just the shattering of illusions, or the loss, or the injury, but also the intense shame and self-loathing because of one's reaction to that trauma. Flight attendants, in my experience, seem to have a feeling that they should be emotionally invincible, impervious to fears having to do with flying. Many flight attendants have expressed feelings of humiliation to me about such fears, and this shame seems to be as painful as the fear itself. Several flight attendants have expressed thoughts such as "if I were strong or spiritually grounded, I wouldn't be feeling depressed or anxious." Thus, ordinary feelings that many people in a similar situation would experience are felt to be somehow shameful.

Some flight attendants may be feeling more traumatized than others, and this seems important to understand. Just because some people are frightened and unable to fly right now doesn't mean that they are weak or don't have strong character. The situation is made worse for some people because it represents a "retraumatization," a feeling of repetition of a childhood history of trauma, which leaves them more vulnerable. That childhood trauma can be anything, including the early death of a parent or family member, early separation from loved ones through divorce or tragedy, or any form of abuse or extreme disillusionment. "Retraumatization" happens most often when there is a close replication of the original trauma, such as a loss of the way of life as one knew it, loss of a sense of power, loss of a sense of safety, loss of a sense of innocence, loss of a sense of control or brings back a state such as fear, horror, shock, panic or helplessness. For example, what happened on September 11 could be experienced as much worse by someone who early on in life has already experienced a shattering loss.

People who have already had an experience with trauma while flying are more likely to be "retraumatized" by the events of September 11. Such trauma can take the form of a major illness onboard the aircraft, an aircraft evacuation, an assault on a passenger or crew member, the death of a passenger, an airplane crash or any perception of serious threat to self, other crew members or passengers. Many of you may have "gotten right back on the horse" after other incidents, and never really understood its impact on you. So, September 11 may have just compounded an already existing but unrecognized traumatic state. For example, a dangerous experience with turbulence could easily disturb one's sense of safety, and revive old feelings about an earlier loss of a sense of control in life, such as the divorce of one's parents. Also, one might expect that any disaster that happens subsequent to September 11 will have a similar "retraumatizing" impact, as did the crash of Flight 587.

Your most important function at work besides safety has always been to provide passengers with a sense of comfort and reassurance, and a denial of the possibility of death. I am imaging you offering "coffee, tea or immortality," and that's an extremely difficult task when you're feeling at risk yourself. It's important that each one of you be able to find a place within a relationship for your disturbing experiences and feelings, rather than having to bear them alone, and to recognize that there's nothing inherently shameful about these painful experiences and fears. Shame only contributes to keeping feelings hidden and makes you emotionally isolated. I urge you to tell each other how you're really feeling. Getting together in small groups to talk can be extremely helpful. Leaning on your religious or spiritual faith can be of great comfort. Symptoms of trauma do improve with time and talking about it. If, however, you continue to experience symptoms after reaching out to family or friends or faith, then it's time to seek out the help of a professional therapist.

?

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Dr. Paul Zeitz: GLOBAL ACTION ALERT: Call for Wiki-Justice System for Inclusive, Divere Participation in "American Idea" and "Global Idea" Competitions Which are Planned to be Launched on 1 January 2011: Today is 30 Days Until Global Marches for Justice on 17 January 201

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Iraq Sanctions: UN Security Council Lifts Key Restrictions

UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. Security Council gave a unanimous vote of confidence Wednesday to the significant strides Iraq has taken by lifting 19-year-old sanctions on weapons and civilian nuclear power.

The council also decided to return control of Iraq's oil and natural gas revenue to the government next summer and to settle all remaining claims over the controversial oil-for-food program, which helped ordinary Iraqis cope with sanctions imposed after Saddam Hussein's army invaded Kuwait two decades ago.

Although some sanctions will remain in place until Iraq and Kuwait settle outstanding issues from that war, Wednesday's vote was a major step to restore Iraq's international standing a year before the U.S. is to pull its last troops out of the country. It came a day after a power-sharing agreement ended a lengthy deadlock on forming a new Iraqi government.

Vice President Joe Biden, who presided over the meeting, told the council the move marked "an important milestone for the government of Iraq and people of Iraq in their ongoing effort to leave behind their troubled past and embrace a much brighter future."

"The three resolutions we've passed bring an end to the burdensome remnants of the dark era of Saddam Hussein," he said.

Biden's presence was a sign of the importance the Obama administration gave to the vote. The U.S. holds the Security Council presidency this month.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said the adoption of the resolutions "marks the beginning of the end of the sanctions regime and restrictions on Iraq's sovereignty, independence and recovery."

"Our key focus has been to unburden Iraq from the heavy legacy of non-compliance with international law and to break its isolation and regain its rightful place among the community of nations," he told the council.

Zebari said in an interview with The Associated Press that Biden's presence and the resolutions "showed continued American engagement with Iraq – that it's not abandoned."

Iraq has been pressing the Security Council for several years to end sanctions and cancel more than 70 resolutions adopted after Saddam's war against Kuwait.

Zebari said following the council's votes Wednesday only about a dozen resolutions remain, all related to outstanding issues between Iraq and Kuwait.

The council expressed confidence in Iraq's commitments to nonproliferation by lifting sanctions against acquiring weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles or pursuing a civilian nuclear power program.

Iraq's constitution bars the country from acquiring weapons of mass destruction, and Baghdad is a party to most of the main nuclear, chemical, biological and missile treaties.

The council had said in February that it would lift the ban on Iraq's use of civilian nuclear power after it ratified several additional international treaties along with a protocol that allows the International Atomic Energy Agency to carry out unannounced inspections.

Iraq has not done so, mainly because of the failure to form a new government. On Wednesday, the council urged Iraq to ratify the protocol and the nuclear test ban treaty "as soon as possible." It also asked for a progress report in 12 months.

Zebari said in the interview that lifting these sanctions was "very, very significant" because it will enable the Iraqi ministries of higher education, health and agriculture to import technologies, pesticides and other materials that were banned because they had both civilian and military uses.

Ending sanctions will also enable the defense ministry to buy artillery or missiles with a range beyond 150 kilometers (90 miles), which "means that Iraq again would be a normal country like any other country," he said.

Zebari said every country should have the right to a civilian nuclear program, "but for a country like ours that has been the victims of Saddam's policies and belligerence and aggression and defiance, I think we'll think twice before going down any road close to that."

A second resolution, adopted unanimously, ends the international management of the Development Fund for Iraq on June 30, 2011. The fund was set up after Saddam's regime was toppled in 2003 to try to ensure that the proceeds of the country's gas and oil sales were used to help its people and restore its economy.

The resolution, which will end Iraq's immunity from claims on the proceeds, calls on Iraq to set up a successor mechanism. The resolution ensures that 5 percent of oil and gas revenue will still go into a compensation fund, used mainly to pay Kuwaiti claims from the war, according to a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly.

The third resolution, terminating all remaining activities of the oil-for-food program, was adopted by a vote of 14-0 with France abstaining. France's U.N. Ambassador Gerard Araud said it "did not include all of the safeguards we thought was necessary for our support."

The resolution authorizes U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to ensure that $20 million from the account is retained in escrow until Dec. 31, 2016, for U.N. expenses related to ending the program, and another $131 million to meet all other activities related to the fund including outstanding contracts.

The council said the rest of the money in the program – which U.S. officials estimate at about $650 million – should be transferred to the Development Fund for Iraq "as soon as possible."

The oil-for-food program, which ran from 1996 to 2003, allowed Iraq to sell oil so long as most of the money went to buy humanitarian goods. It was aimed at easing Iraqi suffering under U.N. sanctions and was a lifeline for 90 percent of the country's population.

But an 18-month U.N.-sanctioned investigation led by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker found massive corruption in the program. Its final report in October 2005 accused more than 2,200 companies from some 40 countries of colluding with Saddam's regime to bilk $1.8 billion.

In May 2003, weeks after the U.S. invaded Iraq, the council lifted economic sanctions, opening the country to international trade and investment and allowing oil exports to resume. In June 2004, the council lifted an embargo on the sale of conventional weapons to the government.

Iraq's outstanding issues with Kuwait include the major obstacle of demarcating their border as well as accounting for 600 missing Kuwaitis, returning missing property and archives, and the estimated $22 billion Baghdad owes Kuwait as reparations for the invasion.

Zebari told the council "there has been positive cooperation and exchange between our two governments to resolve and settle all pending issues," but he said "Iraq still has some way to go" reach a final agreement.

Saddam's invasion of Kuwait came as the country was just recovering from a draining eight-year war with Iran. Baghdad had long been a regional power and cultured society with the highest literacy rate in Arab world – but with violence lurking just under the surface.

A U.S.-led force drove Saddam's army out of Kuwait in the 1991 Gulf War, and the U.N. then imposed the sanctions. The second war – when a U.S.-led force invaded Iraq and toppled the regime in 2003 – was ostensibly to stop Saddam from developing weapons of mass destruction. Such weapons were never found.

Get HuffPost World On Twitter and Facebook!

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Michael Giltz: DVDs: Peanuts & Other New Holiday Titles

Okay, you already own It's A Wonderful Life and A Christmas Story and some Rankin Bass. But maybe you need a new title or two to spruce up your holiday DVD collection. Here are some recent releases to consider:

2010-12-16-51xNZKCrLqL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

PEANUTS HOLIDAY COLLECTION ($42.98 BluRay or $39.98 regular; Warner Bros.) -- Okay, if you own any TV specials at all you probably own one of the previous DVD collections that features the classic A Charlie Brown Christmas. But the myriad Peanuts specials have been packaged and repackaged so many times it's impossible to keep track of them all. So what's the draw here? Well, BluRay of course, not to mention a deluxe version with a snowglobe and some other doodads. The prints have always been taken care of by Warner Bros., so the improvement of these very old TV shows isn't dramatic, but they do look good. The sale price of the BluRay edition costs almost TWICE as much as the regular DVDs, which is ridiculous. After all these years, just give us one definitive set of every Peanuts special ever made and be done with it. If money is no object and for some reason you don't already own that Peanuts classic, this set contains it and It's The Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown (their other major classic), A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving and three bonus specials.

2010-12-16-51FrcOlUnPL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

THE YEAR WITHOUT A SANTA CLAUS ($24.98; Warner Bros.) -- One of the best Rankin/Bass specials, you wouldn't know it by the packaging but this set also contains the so-so Nestor, The Long-Eared Christmas Donkey and Rudolph's Shiny New Year. Add in some extras and you've got about two hours of entertainment. Of course, if your kids aren't around you'll just jump to "Heat Miser" and sing along. BluRay looks better but not dramatically so; no surprise on such old titles made for TV.

2010-12-16-61Ga4MwMHSL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

A CHRISTMAS CAROL ($39.99; Disney) -- I'm still not down with director Robert Zemeckis and his modern spin on rotoscoping -- live actors do a scene and then it gets animated. As with his earlier film The Polar Express, the animated characters seem stiff and a little dead in the eyes. The work is improved but still not ready for prime time. However, overlooked in the technological boundary-pushing is the fact that Jim Carrey gives one of his best performances in years as Scrooge. His work is subtle, funny, menacing and real. Too bad it's hidden in a film that thinks the timeless classic by Charles Dickens needs jazzing up by shrinking down Scrooge and send him rocketing down streets or up into the night sky. Absurd.

2010-12-16-61Z34NcovRL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

IT'S A VERY MERRY MUPPET CHRISTMAS ($14.98; Universal) -- A Muppet spin on It's A Wonderful Life with Kermit finding out that indeed the world would have been worse off if he had never been a little tadpole, not better. The draw here for this so-so Muppet entry is a nine song CD with the gang caroling through holiday standards like "Deck The Halls."

2010-12-16-51qDqD8AmpL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

SANTA CLAUS: THE MOVIE ($14.98; Lionsgate) -- A stodgy precursor to the Will Ferrell comedy Elf (which is quite good), Santa Claus: The Movie fails on several levels. First, a movie about Santa Claus shouldn't spend half the film focusing on an elf, even if the elf is played by Dudley Moore. On the other hand, trying to recapture the magic of Superman: The Movie by replicating the formula of that classic film. Unfortunately, rather than elevating the Superman myth by treating it like an epic, almost Christ-like origin story, doing the same with Santa Claus just seems tiresome and vaguely absurd. Still with me? Probably not. And the movie doesn't hold your attention any better.

2010-12-16-51P1PZ00k8L._SL500_AA300_.jpg

PHINEAS AND FERB: A VERY PERRY CHRISTMAS ($19.99; Warner Bros.) -- This is a good bargain: you get an amusing P&F Christmas special along with a batch of other episodes and a welcome number of extras like a karaoke function that lets you sing along with Perry, Christmas wish lists for all the characters and more. Cheeky humor with pop cultural references put this in the Looney Tunes vein. The only shame is that fans of the show don't have the option to purchase an entire season of episodes. But kids shows almost always seem to get divvied up into multiple sets for some reason.

2010-12-16-51RvqOGhkL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

NATIVITY! ($14.98; Freestyle) -- Decent family fare that mixes Glee with the holidays by having a hapless high school teacher mount a musical Nativity special. The main draw here is Martin Freeman, charming as always. He's enshrined forever thanks to the UK version of The Office, but when you toss in the current modern spin on Sherlock Holmes (he plays Dr. Watson) an the upcoming film(s) The Hobbit, with Freeman as Bilbo Baggins, and you've got a genuine pop culture icon in the making. This doesn't spruce up his resume but it's no embarrassment either.

ALSO OUT:

NUTCRACKER SWEET ($14.98; Lionsgate) -- My little friend Katie Rose absolutely LOVES Angelina Ballerina and she's sure to eat this up when I give it to her. Reviews are meaningless in this context.

MERRY CHRISTMAS, OLIVIA ($16.99; Paramount) -- I'm a big fan of the Olivia books by Ian Falconer but still can't quite buy Olivia in this computer-animated version. Still, the holidays bring out the pushy best in Olivia.

TWAS THE NIGHT BEFORE CHRISTMAS ($19.98; Warner Bros.) -- The magic of Rankin/Bass did not transfer to animation: stop-motion is the format where they shine. Plus, 24 minutes of minor R/B for $20 is simply far too much.

CHANUKAH: THE MISSING MENORAH ($14.95; Shalom Sesame) -- Grover's bringing the latkas...but where's the menorah? Given the paucity of Jewish-themed holiday specials, this is especially welcome.

*****
Thanks for reading. Michael Giltz is the cohost of Showbiz Sandbox, a weekly pop culture podcast that reveals the industry take on entertainment news of the day and features top journalists and opinion makers as guests. It's available free on iTunes. Visit Michael Giltz at his website and his daily blog. Download his podcast of celebrity interviews and his radio show, also called Popsurfing and also available for free on iTunes. Link to him on Netflix and gain access to thousands of ratings and reviews.

NOTE: Michael Giltz is provided with free copies of DVDs to consider for review. He typically does not guarantee coverage and invariably receives far more screeners and DVDs than he can cover each week. Also, Michael Giltz freelances as a writer of DVD copy (the text that appears on the back of DVDs) for some titles released by IFC and other subsidiaries of MPI. It helps pay the rent, but does not obligate him in any way to speak positively or negatively of their titles.

?

Follow Michael Giltz on Twitter: www.twitter.com/michaelgiltz

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Patricia Handschiegel: The New Power Girls: 5 Habits Business Travelers Must Have Today

It was a simple enough trip. A business traveler, on the way home from a few days of meetings in a remote city, is stranded by way of an airline with the reputation of rarely getting passengers to their destination, let alone on time. The option of two hotels are offered, and the Sheraton Airport Hotel Tempe, near Phoenix, is selected -- after all, it's a Starwood hotel, the same company that owns the Westin and other properties. By no means the highest of the lodging food chain but by no stretch usually horrible. The idea of forgoing the airline's options and selecting a separate hotel was considered, but it was late and had been a long day. The flight was delayed, then had mechanical failure, then ran out of food after keeping passengers on the runway for over two hours. The stay at the hotel would be less than eight hours, less than the average work day.

It wasn't surprising afterward to read the reviews online about the hotel being "dirty," "in need of cleaning" and "lice infested." That was the near exact experience. One guest shared that they found a pair of men's underwear in plain sight in the bathroom, clearly due to the room they were in never being cleaned. Another talked about there being hair in the drain of the sink. In fact, more reviews referenced the hotel being filthy and poorly maintained than anything else. It was stunning that the airline would put its passengers in such a dirty and poorly managed place.

It's not the first horror story you've heard about business travel. Today entrepreneurs and executives aren't just being hit by airlines cutting back and increasing costs, security measures and other obstacles, but dirty hotels, bed bugs and a whole host of other things. The Sheraton is an example. Here's what you can do about it:

1. Google search all hotels before you stay in them, and include the words "lice," "bed bugs," and "scabies." Fortunately sites like Trip Advisor and Yelp give candid details about the experience consumers have, good or bad. While bed bugs can spread to even the cleanest hotels, there are a bunch of sites dedicated to alerting travelers of hotels that have infestations.

2. Take note of the room, bed, etc. the minute you get in. While you may have a particular hotel you like to stay in and are confident in its management, the hotel an airline puts you in might be another story. Regardless, take stock of the room the minute you walk in, including foul odors, dirty surfaces, etc. If the room doesn't seem up to par, ask for another immediately.

3. Invest in a hard case suitcase. You've got a better chance of protecting yourself and your items from bugs and other problems with hard case luggage over fabric and other materials. While bugs can still get in by way of zippers, etc., they won't be able to sneak through fabric fibers, etc. There are also luggage and travel bags that seal in your clothing and bags available online and in stores.

4. Do not unpack, and do not put your suitcase on the floor. A lot of people immediately unpack their clothes in their hotel rooms, or throw their suitcase on the floor. Avoid this, as clothing in drawers, etc. can be exposed to insects, while suitcases on carpeting can suffer the same.

5. Act immediately. If you feel something crawling on you in the bed at night, chances are there is something crawling on you. Immediately get up, remove your clothing and take a hot shower. Put the clothing in the sink so that nothing else you own is affected, then have it bagged in a sealable bag and if you can, keep it out of your luggage. Do not bring your suitcase or any of its contents into your home once you've returned. Either leave it in the car for a few days (the heat or cold should kill most bugs) or remove everything from it and wash immediately in the hottest water you can.

?

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Josh Ozersky: How Traif came to Williamsburg

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

HuffPost TV: Arianna 'Tawks' Education With Fran Drescher (VIDEO)

Arianna sat down to "tawk" with Fran Drescher on Tuesday. The former "Nanny" star recently launched her eponymous (and phonetic) "Fran Drescher Tawk Show."

Drescher's first question was about Arianna's strong positions and the reactions she gets.

"Especially women, they love it when you speak your mind," explained Arianna. "All of us as women have grown up with this desire to be constantly approved, and our fear is about expressing ourselves. When one of us does it, it's really validation for the rest of us. I feel that you can do it with grace and you can do it in a way that just makes it clear 'this is my truth, this is what I believe.' It can be about everything. You can have strong opinions, as I do, about politics and also about sleep. I'm a big believer in sleep!"

That kicked off the wide-ranging conversation. Along with politics and media, Arianna tackled education and had high praise for Michelle Rhee. "She's acting like a mom worrying about her own children," said Arianna while recognizing Rhee for bringing a sense of urgency to education.

WATCH:

?

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Robert Scheer: Return of the Great Triangulator

The sight of Bill Clinton back on the White House podium defending tax cuts for the super-rich was more a sick joke than a serious amplification of economic policy. How desperate is the current president that he would turn to the great triangulator, who opened the floodgates to banking greed, for validation of the sorry opportunistic hodgepodge that passes for this administration's economic policy? A policy designed and implemented by the same Clinton-era holdovers whose radical deregulation of the financial industry created this mess in the first place.

As a candidate running against Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama quite accurately excoriated the economic policies of the Clinton years when the Democratic president united with congressional Republicans, led by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Phil Gramm, to obliterate sensible regulations of the New Deal. The result, as candidate Obama noted in March 2008, has been chaos:

"Unfortunately, instead of establishing a 21st century regulatory framework, we simply dismantled the old one--aided by a legal but corrupt bargain in which campaign money all too often shaped policy and watered down oversight. In doing so, we encouraged a winner-take-all, anything-goes environment that helped foster devastating dislocations in our economy."

These dislocations were authorized when Clinton signed off on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which reversed the Glass-Steagall Act's separation between the high rollers of investment banking and the properly conservative, insured and regulated activities of commercial banks entrusted with the life savings of ordinary folks. With a stroke of a pen that he then presented as a gift to Citigroup CEO Sandy Weill, Clinton opened the door to the too-big-to-fail monstrosities that have caused so much misery.

Back in 1999, even though he had been warned of the coming financial instability, foreshadowed by the collapse of Long-Term Capital Management, Clinton was giddy in signing the bill: "Over the past seven years we have tried to modernize the economy," he enthused. "And today what we are doing is modernizing the financial services industry, tearing down those antiquated laws and granting banks significant new authority."

A year later Clinton signed off on the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, advanced most fiercely by his treasury secretary, Lawrence Summers, who has been the dominant personality setting economic policy for Obama. Titles 3 and 4 of that act summarily exempted from the surveillance of any existing regulatory agency or laws all of the newfangled financial gimmicks -- the collateralized debt obligations and credit default swaps -- that have proved so toxic to the jobs and homes of tens of millions of Americans.

In his rambling and somewhat incoherent comments on the economy at the White House last week, Clinton attempted to explain away the failure of the banks to use the money that the government has made available to them to shore up housing and create jobs. As an aside, in commenting on community banks, Clinton touched on the mortgage security mess that his law enabled, but he still doesn't seem to get his connection with the problem: " ... some of them may have a few mortgage issues unresolved, most of that mortgage debt has been offloaded to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or has vanished into cyber-sphere with those securitized subprime mortgages. I don't like the securities, but they happened."

What gibberish. The mortgage-backed securities didn't just happen. Clinton signed legislation freeing those securities from any effective government regulation. Most Americans' homes, which represented their dreams and savings, were turned into gambling chips in the Wall Street casino on a scale unknown and indeed unthinkable before the Clinton presidency. What has vanished is the equity of homeowners. As for the offloading to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that represents at least a $700 billion burden on taxpayers who have had to bail out those government-sponsored agencies that became totally corrupt on Clinton's watch.

The bottom line on the Clinton legacy is that the census now finds an all-time high of 44 million Americans living under the poverty line, bringing us back, as a percentage of the population, to Bill Clinton's first two years in office. One big difference is that thanks to Clinton's so-called welfare reform program, there is no longer a significant federal anti-poverty program, and the plight of the poor is now a problem for the state governments, which also have been impoverished thanks to the bursting of the Clinton bubble.

As a candidate, Obama laid responsibility for the meltdown on the bipartisan deregulation of the Clinton years: "This loss has not happened by accident. It's because of decisions made in boardrooms, on trading floors, and in Washington. Under Republican and Democratic administrations, we failed to guard against practices that all too often rewarded financial manipulation instead of productivity and sound business practices. We let the special interest put their thumbs on the economic scales."

That's the path Clinton followed after his party's electoral reversal after he had been in office two years, a fact that made it all that more ominous to witness the great triangulator back on a White House podium.

?

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

End Of Days For Bookstores? Not If They Can Help It

npr.org:

There was a time, not so long ago, when chain bookstores had a pretty bad reputation. Barnes & Noble and Borders were seen as predators eager to destroy local booksellers -- and neighborhood bookstores were weathering threats from all sides. Megastores like Costco started selling bestsellers and encroaching on local shops. Then came a little company called Amazon, and the rise of online book buying. The indies were struggling to make ends meet, and many had to close their doors.

Read the whole story: npr.org

Get HuffPost Books On Twitter and Facebook!

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Promotes Terrorism? YouTube Is Letting Users Decide On Terrorism-Related Videos

Los Angeles Times:

Nudity. Sexual activity. Animal abuse. All are reasons YouTube users can flag a video for removal from the website. Add a new category: promotes terrorism.

YouTube and its parent company, Google, have been criticized by lawmakers for refusing to prescreen militant speeches and propaganda videos that have been cited in more than a dozen terrorism investigations over the last five years.

Read the whole story: Los Angeles Times

Get HuffPost Technology On Twitter and Facebook!

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Best Books 2010: 13 'Best Of' Lists (PHOTOS)

The lists are up, the decisions are out: publications across the globe have selected their favorite books of 2010. From Jonathan Franzen's "Freedom" to Patti Smith's "Just Kids," there were many predi...

The lists are up, the decisions are out: publications across the globe have selected their favorite books of 2010. From Jonathan Franzen's "Freedom" to Patti Smith's "Just Kids," there were many predi...

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

WalMart In New York? Chain Tries Again For NYC Store

NEW YORK — Wal-Mart is again trying to open stores in New York City after failing twice because of community opposition, tweaking its message and its strategy.

Steven Restivo, a spokesman for the Bentonville, Ark.-based Wal-Mart Stores Inc., told The New York Times in its online edition Sunday that the retailer is looking at sites throughout the city.

"There is a business case to be made for our growth in large cities across the country," Restivo said. "We know we have customers there, and we know we want to make access to our brand more convenient."

The company is looking at parcels in all five boroughs, including some far smaller than what it typically seeks for its stores, he said.

Restivo said the company could help with the city's unemployment problems, and is focusing its real estate search on low-income neighborhoods where there is a lack of access to fresh food.

One of those neighborhoods could be the East New York section of Brooklyn.

Arturo Payambs, the owner of a Compare Supermarkets, told The New York Daily News in Sunday editions that he didn't like the idea of the retailer moving into his local market.

"It's like David and Goliath... We're just a small business. We cannot compare with the prices," the 28-year-old Payambs said.

State Assemblyman Darryl C. Towns, whose Brooklyn district covers East New York, told the Times that a lot of his constituents are looking for jobs.

"We have to begin to think out of the box and look at some different opportunities," he said.

Wal-Mart is taking measured steps, including hiring Mayor Michael Bloomberg's former campaign manager to oversee its lobbying efforts. Bloomberg had previously supported the company's failed effort to redevelop a Bronx site into a commercial complex.

The City Council had scheduled a meeting to discuss Wal-Mart's efforts for Tuesday, but the interest forced officials to reschedule for January.

Attempts by Wal-Mart to develop stores in the city have been successfully blocked by opposition from labor unions, community groups and elected officials.

Get HuffPost New York On Twitter and Facebook!

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here